Contract analysis pricing, checked against Litera's own pages
Litera does not publish a price for Kira. The figures in circulation run from about $100 per user per month to $50,000 or more a year, and they cannot all be the entry point. Here is what Litera actually confirms, what the reported numbers mean for a firm your size, and what a published flat price looks like for reading a stack of contracts.
Every CaseClerk price on this page is a published rate from our pricing page, not a quote.
Upload the contracts from one deal and ask across all of them: change of control, assignment, exclusivity, termination for convenience. Every answer names the file, the clause and the sentence it came from. 25 pages on the house, no card.
Free preview, no account needed: up to 3 files and 10 pages.
Litera does not publish Kira pricing. Kira is sold on a custom contract set by the number of users, the volume of contracts you review and the size of the deployment. Pricing directories report about $100 to $500 per user per month plus $10,000 to $30,000 to implement, and AI review sites report $50,000 or more a year for enterprise deals. Litera has confirmed none of these figures.
If what you need is to find specific clauses across a few hundred contracts rather than run a standing diligence platform, CaseClerk does that job at a published $99 to $499 a month.
Count last year's contracts
Add up the agreements you actually reviewed in diligence or audits in the last 12 months and estimate their pages. That is the workload you are buying for, not the pipeline you hope for.
Ask for one all-in annual figure
License, implementation, training, custom fields and support in one number, in writing, for the term you would sign. Then ask what year two costs.
Divide by contracts reviewed
Annual cost divided by last year's contract count gives a cost per contract. It is the easiest way to see whether a platform price makes sense at your volume.
Run a real deal through a flat priced tool
Put one closed deal's contracts through CaseClerk and ask the questions your associates answered by hand. If that covers the job, you have a second number to hold against the quote.
Kira is a mature, specialist extraction platform built for large diligence teams. CaseClerk is a document reading tool with a published price. This table is for deciding which of those jobs you are paying for.
| Kira (Litera) | Luminance | Spellbook | CaseClerk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price visibility | Quote only | Quote only | Quote only | Published: $99, $249, $499 a month. A fourth Enterprise tier is quoted, and we say so |
| Billing model | Reported per user, custom contract | Custom enterprise agreement; one pricing index describes document volume metering | By team size, custom | Flat account price with a monthly page allowance |
| Pre-built clause extraction | Yes, 1,400+ smart fields plus trainable fields | Yes | Clause review inside Word | No pre-built field library. You ask for the clause in plain English |
| Review grids for diligence | Yes, collaborative review grids | Yes | No, one contract at a time in Word | No grid. Answers across the whole file, each naming the file, clause and source sentence |
| Drafting and redlining | Via other Litera products | Yes, Negotiate module | Yes, its core product | No. It reads, it does not draft |
| Best for | Large firms and diligence teams on repeat deal types | In-house legal teams running a contract repository | Transactional lawyers drafting in Word | Small firms that need to find what is in a stack of contracts without a platform contract |
Competitor features are taken from each vendor's own website. Competitor prices are third-party reports; none of these vendors publishes one.
Buy Kira for standing diligence at scale
If your firm runs M&A, real estate or finance diligence every month and needs trained extraction fields and a shared review grid, Kira is built for that. Litera says 70% of the top 50 global law firms rely on its products.
Think again for a handful of deals a year
At two or three diligence projects a year, a per user license plus implementation can cost more than the associate hours it saves. The job you need done is reading a few hundred contracts accurately, a few times.
Use CaseClerk for the reading
Upload the data room export, up to 1,000 files in one case, and ask "which agreements have a change of control clause" or "list every contract that auto-renews and its notice period". Each answer names the file, the clause and the sentence, so you check it in seconds.
Keep your drafting tool
CaseClerk does not redline. If you draft in Word with Spellbook or a similar add-in, keep it. CaseClerk sits next to it for the file level questions a drafting tool is not built to answer.
We collected the Kira figures that show up on pages ranking for Kira pricing. They measure different things, and none of them comes from Litera.
| What is reported | Figure | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Kira, entry per user | Starts at about $100 per user per month | ITQlick pricing directory. Litera has not confirmed it |
| Kira, per user range | $100 to $500 per user per month | Software pricing directories, described as benchmarks, not a rate card |
| Kira, implementation | About $10,000 to $30,000 upfront for a small or mid-size deployment; over $50,000 at enterprise scale | Same directories, labeled as estimates |
| Kira, annual contract | $50,000 or more a year, enterprise only; $30,000 to $60,000 for mid-market firms | AI tool review sites (Tools for Humans, Agent Finder), citing conversations with legal ops teams |
| Kira, list price | None published | Litera's Kira product page shows no price, no plan names and no self-serve checkout |
| CaseClerk | $99, $249 or $499 a month for the account | Our pricing page. Published, no sales call |
Look at the first and fourth rows together. Ten users at $100 a month is $12,000 a year, which is far below a reported $50,000 enterprise floor. Both can be true only if the low figure describes a seat price inside a much larger contract. That is the most likely reading, and it is why a small firm should ask for the all-in annual number, not a per user price.
We multiplied the reported per user range by a few common firm sizes and set the CaseClerk plan that covers the same pages next to it. We assumed about 15 pages per commercial contract; leases and credit agreements run much longer, so size it to your own documents.
| Firm and job | Kira at the reported $100 to $500 per user per month | CaseClerk plan that fits |
|---|---|---|
| Solo attorney, one diligence project of 150 contracts (about 2,000 pages) | $1,200 to $6,000 a year for one seat, plus implementation if Litera charges it at this size | Solo, $99 a month (2,500 pages) |
| 3 lawyer transactional practice, 300 contracts a quarter (about 4,500 pages) | $3,600 to $18,000 a year in seats | Professional, $249 a month (10,000 pages) |
| 10 lawyer firm, rolling diligence of about 1,000 contracts (about 15,000 pages) | $12,000 to $60,000 a year in seats, and at the reported $50,000 enterprise floor the upper end is the realistic one | Firm, $499 a month (30,000 pages) |
| 25+ lawyer M&A practice with standing diligence teams | Quote. This is the buyer Kira is priced for | Enterprise tier, quoted on request |
CaseClerk's annual billing costs six months' price, so Professional billed yearly is $1,494 and Firm is $2,994. Kira figures are annual seat costs only and leave out implementation.
Kira started in Toronto in 2011 as Kira Systems and was acquired by Litera in August 2021; the machine learning research team spun out as Zuva at the same time. Today Litera sells it as Kira, with 1,400+ pre-built smart fields, fields you train yourself, collaborative review grids for M&A, real estate and banking work, and a stated 95%+ precision on target provisions. Litera also bundles Lito, its generative AI assistant, at no additional charge for Kira customers.
That is a serious diligence platform. The honest question for a small or mid-size firm is not whether Kira is good. It is whether you review enough contracts, often enough, to use what a platform contract pays for.
Yes, if your job is finding clauses and facts across a set of contracts rather than running a standing extraction platform. CaseClerk reads every document in a case at once, up to 1,000 files in 18 formats including scans, and answers plain English questions with the file, clause and sentence named. It costs $99 to $499 a month on a published price list, and you can test it on 25 pages without a card.
What it will not do: it has no pre-built clause library, no trainable fields and no review grid. If you need those, buy Kira or a peer. See our full AI contract review software page for how the categories compare, and Spellbook pricing if you are also weighing a Word drafting tool.
Litera does not publish Kira pricing. It is sold on a custom contract based on users, contract volume and deployment size. Pricing directories report about $100 to $500 per user per month plus $10,000 to $30,000 to implement, and review sites report $50,000 or more a year for enterprise deals. None of these figures is confirmed by Litera.
Yes. Kira Systems was acquired by Litera in August 2021, and the product is now sold as Kira through Litera's sales team. Older articles that quote Kira Systems prices describe the pre-acquisition company, so treat any figure from before 2022 as out of date.
Litera's Kira product page does not offer a self-serve trial or checkout; the route in is a demo request. Some software directories mention a trial on request. If you want to test on your own documents first, ask for a proof of concept on a closed deal as part of the sales process.
Kira uses machine learning fields to find and extract provisions such as assignment, change of control and termination from each contract, then shows them in a review grid your team works through. Litera says it ships 1,400+ pre-built fields, lets you train your own, and pairs this predictive model with generative AI.
It depends on volume. Kira is priced for firms running diligence continuously. A firm doing a few projects a year may pay more in license and implementation than the associate time it saves. Price your last 12 months of contract review before you sign, and compare it with a flat priced reading tool.
For reading and questioning a stack of contracts, CaseClerk costs $99 to $499 a month on a published price list and answers with the file, clause and sentence named. It has no pre-built field library or review grid, so large diligence teams that rely on those should stay with Kira or a similar platform.
Nobody can say from public data, because neither Litera nor Luminance publishes a price. Both are custom enterprise contracts. Luminance is usually bought by in-house teams for a contract repository, Kira by law firms for diligence, so the quotes are built on different units.
Upload the contracts from one deal, ask what your associates would have looked for, and see the clause each answer came from. 25 pages, no card, published prices from $99 a month.
Start free trialAI contract review software
How file level review, Word drafting tools and manual review compare on cost and fit.
Luminance pricing
Luminance prints no price either. What sets the quote and why the most quoted number is not a price.
Spellbook pricing
What a Spellbook seat is reported to cost and when a drafting tool is the wrong purchase.
Harvey AI pricing
Harvey's seat minimum priced per lawyer, next to a flat published price.
CaseClerk pricing
Three published tiers with page allowances printed next to each. A year costs six months.
Sign up