For PI firms shortlisting against Supio

Supio Alternatives and Supio Competitors for Personal Injury Firms

Supio sells by demo and quote, so most firms comparing it want two things: who else does the job, and what that costs. Here are the real Supio competitors, the price each one prints on its own site, and one you can test on a live claim today.

Every vendor fact here was read on that vendor's own website. Where a vendor prints no price, we say so instead of guessing.

Test a Supio alternative on one real claim

Upload the medical records, bills and police report for a claim and ask what the demand needs. Every answer names the document and page. 25 pages on the house, no card.

Choose files PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, emails, images and scans Up to 1,000 files in one case

Uploading your files

Free preview, no account needed: up to 3 files and 10 pages.

What are the best Supio alternatives?

The closest Supio alternatives are EvenUp and Eve Legal, which also build medical chronologies and draft demands for plaintiff firms, and Parambil for medical record review in med mal and mass torts. All four sell by quote. If you need a price on the page, CaseMark charges $25 plus a cent a page per chronology, Casefleet charges $30 or $140 per user a month, and CaseClerk reads the whole file and cites every answer from $99 a month.

Choose by the job you are paying for. If you want the demand drafted, take EvenUp and Eve demos with the same file. If your team loses the week finding treatment gaps, prior injuries and billed totals, that is a reading job, and it costs far less than a platform.

Paralegal at a personal injury firm reviewing a stack of medical records and bills next to a laptop

0: Published prices from Supio, EvenUp, Eve or Parambil
Per case: How Supio says it bills, scaled by volume, in its own directory listing
$25: CaseMark's starting price per medical chronology, printed
$99: CaseClerk Solo a month for the account, 2,500 pages

What to check in any Supio alternative

A number before the demo: Supio, EvenUp, Eve, Parambil and ProPlaintiff all send you to a sales call. Start with the vendors that print a price, then use those numbers to judge the quotes that come back.
The billing unit: Supio and EvenUp price per case, Eve is reported per user, CaseMark per chronology, Casefleet per user and CaseClerk per account. A firm with a few huge files and one with many small ones get opposite answers on cost.
Cites you can check fast: Adjusters and defense counsel test every fact in a demand. Each statement about treatment, dates or bills should point to the page it came from, so a paralegal confirms it in seconds instead of rereading.
Scans and huge record sets: Records show up as faxed scans, portal exports and 2,000 page PDFs. CaseClerk reads up to 1,000 files per case in 20 formats, scanned PDFs and TIFF included, in one matter vault.
Security in writing: Supio states SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PHIPA and GDPR on its site. Ask every alternative for the SOC 2 report, whether your records train any model, how long files are kept and whether it signs a BAA.
More than medical records: A Supio rival built only for medical records stalls on depositions, police reports, insurer letters and policy documents. If the whole file matters, test the whole file, not a sample chart.

How to compare Supio alternatives in one afternoon

1
Pick one settled claim

Choose a closed file where you already know the gaps in care, the prior injuries and the specials. That is your answer key.
2
Run it through CaseClerk

Upload records, bills, the police report and adjuster letters. Ask for the treatment timeline, gaps over 30 days, billed totals by provider and any prior injury to the same body part.
3
Open every cited page

Check the source behind each answer. Count the right ones, the ones needing a fix, and how long the check took.
4
Price it against the Supio quote

If reading was the slow part, a flat plan covers it. If drafting the demand is the slow part, bring the same file to Supio and EvenUp demos and compare the per case quotes.

Supio and CaseClerk, honestly compared

Supio is a full plaintiff platform and does much more than CaseClerk. This table is for deciding which job you are actually buying.

	Supio	CaseClerk
Published price	None. Per case by volume per its directory listing, quoted by sales	$99, $249, $499 and $998 a month for the account
How you start	Book a demo	Self-serve trial, 25 pages, up to 5 files, no card
Drafts demand letters	Yes, a core product	No. It finds and cites the facts you write the demand from
Medical chronologies	Yes, formatted chronologies	Ask for a treatment timeline in plain English, each entry cites its page. No formatted chronology export
Intake and client communications	Yes, Supio Intake and Case Communications	No
Mass torts	Yes, firm level and cross case tools	Any single matter, up to 1,000 files per case
Questions across the whole file	Yes, through Supio Agent	Yes, every answer names the source document
Stated security	SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PHIPA, GDPR, client data not used to train foundation models	Case documents are not used to train any AI model of ours

Supio features and security claims are from supio.com. Supio prints no price; third-party roundups estimate $150 to $400 per user a month, which Supio has not confirmed and which conflicts with its own per case description.

Which PI firms move the reading job to CaseClerk

Solo PI attorneys who write their own demands

You do not want the letter drafted. You want the specials, gaps and prior history pulled from the records with page cites, so the demand takes an hour, not a day. Solo at $99 covers about five 500 page files a month.

Small firms with one or two case managers

Case managers live in the records. Professional at $249 gives 10,000 pages a month in one account, with no per case meter running while you work up a file.

Firms below Supio's sweet spot

Per case platforms pay off at volume. At three to five files a month, a flat plan with page cites often costs less than one or two per case invoices.

Defense counsel answering AI drafted demands

Demands are getting longer because software writes them. Load the demand package and the records behind it, then ask which claimed treatment has no record supporting it.

Supio competitors and the price each one prints

We read each vendor's own site before publishing. Five of the seven route you to a demo. Two print a price you can budget from today.

Alternative	What it sells	Price it prints	How you start
EvenUp	Demand letters, medical chronologies, case insights for PI firms	None. One cost per case since December 19, 2025, set by sales. Reported at about $300 to $800 or more per demand	Demo
Eve Legal	Plaintiff platform with drafting agents, intake and matter audits	No platform price. About $350 per case for med mal chronologies on its own site	Demo or call
Parambil	AI medical record review built for litigation, chronologies, billing analysis, missing record views	None on its site	Book a demo
ProPlaintiff	Plaintiff workflow with record summaries and demand drafting	None on its site	Demo
CaseMark	Pay as you go summaries, no subscription	Medical chronology $25 plus $0.01 a page, capped at $100 for a record set up to 25,000 pages. Deposition summary $25	Self-serve
Casefleet	Litigation case management with fact chronologies	$30 Starter or $140 Advanced AI per user a month. Enterprise from 20 users by quote	14 day trial
CaseClerk	Questions across the whole case file, every answer cites the document	$99, $249, $499 and $998 a month for the account	25 pages, up to 5 files, no card

Notice the billing units do not line up. Supio describes per case pricing by volume in its LawNext directory listing. EvenUp also moved to one cost per case for its whole platform on December 19, 2025. Eve is reported per user. A quote in one shape compared with a budget in another is how firms get surprised in month two, so ask which unit applies before the demo ends.

Supio vs EvenUp

EvenUp is the alternative most firms price first. Both draft demands and build chronologies, both bill per case, and neither prints the number. Supio pushes further into intake, client communications, firm level analytics and mass torts. EvenUp grew up around the demand letter at volume. Our EvenUp vs Supio comparison goes through scope and billing side by side, and the EvenUp pricing breakdown shows the reported per demand figures at different caseloads.

Supio vs Eve Legal

Eve bundles drafting agents with intake and nightly matter audits, and it covers employment, Social Security disability and workers' comp alongside PI. It prints one number, about $350 per med mal chronology. If your docket is wider than auto and premises claims, Eve is the closer like for like rival. Our Eve Legal alternatives page covers the same shortlist from Eve's side.

Supio vs Parambil

Parambil is built for medical record review in litigation: chronologies, provider guides, billing analysis and a view of missing records, for med mal, birth injury, nursing home and mass tort work. It sells to both plaintiff and defense teams and prints no price. Supio's own comparison page argues Parambil handles medical records only. That is worth testing either way, because a PI file is more than the chart.

What reading the records costs at your caseload

CaseMark is the cheapest printed option for a formatted chronology and is worth knowing about. At 1,000 pages a set it comes to $35 a chronology. CaseClerk does a different thing for a similar budget: you ask questions across the whole file, not only the medical records, and every answer cites its page.

Records a month	CaseMark chronologies (1,000 page sets)	CaseClerk plan that covers the pages	What you get from CaseClerk
2 files, about 1,000 pages	2 x $35 = $70	Solo, $99 (2,500 pages)	Questions across every file, page cites
5 files, about 2,500 pages	5 x $35 = $175	Solo, $99 (2,500 pages)	Same, all five claims in one account
10 files, about 5,000 pages	10 x $35 = $350	Professional, $249 (10,000 pages)	Room for bills, depositions and correspondence too
25 files, about 15,000 pages	25 x $35 = $875	Firm, $499 (30,000 pages)	Whole case files, not only the records

Page counts are rough. A soft tissue claim may be 300 pages, a surgery file 2,000 or more, so size this to your own files. If a formatted chronology document is the deliverable you hand to a lawyer, CaseMark wins on price. If your team needs to answer twenty questions per file and verify each one, the flat plan does that without a meter.

When Supio is the better buy

Take the Supio demo if you file enough demands that per case savings add up, you want one vendor for intake, records, drafting and case communications, or you run mass tort dockets where cross case analysis matters. Supio is well funded, raised a $60 million Series B in April 2025, and partners with Thomson Reuters. A reading tool does not replace that. It replaces the hours your paralegals spend finding facts, and it shows you the price before anyone calls you. Our Supio pricing guide lists what to ask before you sign a quote.

Supio alternatives questions from PI firms

Who are Supio's competitors?

EvenUp and Eve Legal are the platforms most often compared with Supio, since all three draft demands and build medical chronologies for plaintiff firms. Parambil and ProPlaintiff compete on medical record review. CaseMark and Casefleet sell narrower jobs at printed prices, and CaseClerk answers questions across the whole case file with page cites from $99 a month.

How much does Supio cost?

Supio does not publish a price. Its own directory listing describes per case pricing that drops with volume, and every figure comes from a sales quote. Third-party roundups estimate $150 to $400 per user a month, which Supio has not confirmed. Our Supio pricing guide sets the real and estimated numbers side by side.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Supio?

Yes, if you need only part of what Supio does. CaseMark sells medical chronologies at $25 plus a cent a page, capped at $100 per record set. CaseClerk reads the whole file and cites every answer from $99 a month for the account. Neither drafts demand letters, which is a core Supio product.

Supio vs EvenUp, which is better?

It depends on scope. Both bill per case and neither prints a price. EvenUp is built around demand letters at volume. Supio also covers intake, client communications, firm analytics and mass torts. Run the same closed claim through both demos and compare the quotes and the output.

Does Supio offer a free trial?

Supio's site offers a demo, not a self-serve trial. If you want to test AI on your own records before a sales call, CaseClerk gives 25 pages and up to 5 files without a card, so you can check each cited answer on a real claim.

Can CaseClerk replace Supio for demand letters?

No. CaseClerk does not draft demands. It finds the treatment dates, providers, gaps in care, prior injuries and billed amounts across the file and names the page each came from. You or your paralegal write the demand from those facts.

Is Supio HIPAA compliant?

Supio states on its own site that it is SOC 2 Type II certified and HIPAA, PHIPA and GDPR compliant, and that client data is not used to train foundation models. Ask any vendor, Supio included, for the SOC 2 report and a BAA before you upload client records.

See what the reading part costs before the Supio demo

Upload one real claim, ask the questions your demand depends on, and check the page behind each answer. 25 pages, no card, plans from $99 a month.

Start free trial

Keep reading

Supio pricing

What Supio says about per case pricing, what others estimate, and what to ask before signing.

EvenUp vs Supio

The two per case plaintiff platforms compared on scope and billing.

EvenUp pricing

EvenUp's per case model and the reported cost per demand at your volume.

Eve Legal alternatives

The same shortlist from Eve's side, with the prices each vendor prints.

AI for personal injury lawyers

Which AI jobs pay off in a PI practice and which need a platform.